W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > September 2012

[RC6] block-non-replaced-height-[001-004]

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:22:22 -0400
Message-ID: <b584e5b03e0b0bb530f3b3d52cf22fc8.squirrel@ed-sh-cp3.entirelydigital.com>
To: "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Arron,

[RC6]
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/block-non-replaced-height-001.htm

[nightly-unstable]
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/block-non-replaced-height-001.htm

I approved this test as is and created a reftest for it.

--------

[RC6]
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/block-non-replaced-height-002.htm

[nightly-unstable]
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/block-non-replaced-height-002.htm

I can not approve this test. Since I am not sure what "has been
propagated to the viewport" means or can mean, I am proposing this test
replacement/substitution:

http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/block-non-replaced-height-002-GT.xht

I hope I will receive comments, feedback on this test and Microsoft's
block-non-replaced-height-002.htm so that a good/best test can prevail.

--------

[RC6]
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/block-non-replaced-height-003.htm

[nightly-unstable]
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/block-non-replaced-height-003.htm


I can not approve this test. div#div1 is the div being the object of
this test: div#div1 has 'overflow: visible' and 'height: auto' but the
blue rectangular area belongs to its single inflow child. So, the test
is not testing the height of that div#div1 but instead comparing the
height of its single inflow child. So, I am proposing this test
replacement/substitution:


http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/block-non-replaced-height-003-GT.xht

--------


[RC6]
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/block-non-replaced-height-004.htm

[nightly-unstable]
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/block-non-replaced-height-004.htm

I can not approve this test. div#div1 is the div being the object of
this test: div#div1 does *not* have 'overflow: scroll'; it has 'height:
auto' but the blue rectangular area belongs to its single inflow child.
So, the test is not testing the height of that div#div1 but instead
comparing the height of its single inflow child. Also, the CSS rule

html, body
            {
                overflow: scroll;
            }

seems inadequate, inappropriate here.

I am proposing this test replacement/substitution:

http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/block-non-replaced-height-004-GT.xht

and here, I believe that the content area of
div#block-level-non-replaced-elem-in-normal-flow should be reduced by
the height of the generated horizontal scrollbar: this means that height
of rectangular blue area plus height of active horizontal scrollbar
should equal the height of the orange rectangular area. So,if my
understanding is correct, no browser (Firefox 15.0.1, Chrome
22.0.1229.79, Opera 12.02) passes this test... albeit I have not checked
how IE9 and IE10 handle this test.

Comments and feedbacks are welcomed.

Gérard
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011:
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite harness:
http://test.csswg.org/harness/

Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Saturday, 29 September 2012 01:22:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 29 September 2012 01:22:51 GMT