- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:08:38 -0400
- To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Hello,
[RC6]
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/abspos-011.htm
[nightly-unstable]
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/abspos-011.htm
[RC6]
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/abspos-012.htm
[nightly-unstable]
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/abspos-012.htm
I've made some changes in those 2 tests mainly so that I could be able
to make an accurate and reliable reftest.
1- font-size
font: bold 2em monospace;
has been replaced with
font: bold 32px/1 monospace;
in both tests. The default font-size for monospace font in user agent
stylesheet varies and it is usually not 16px but rather 10pt or 13px. To
ease the task of testers, I've set to 32px.
2- line-height
Line box height has been specified and does not rely on font used or
browser default.
3- width and height
Finally, I have remove height and width defined in abspos-012
since they were unneeded, unnecessary and extraneous declarations inside
the test goal.
So,
div { position: relative; height: 10em; }
p { position: absolute; height: 4em; width: 10em; font: bold 32px/1
monospace; }
has been replaced with
div { position: relative; }
p { position: absolute; font: bold 32px/1 monospace; }
Gérard
--
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/
CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011:
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html
CSS 2.1 test suite harness:
http://test.csswg.org/harness/
Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2012 01:09:06 UTC