W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2012

[RC6] max-width-[001-108] tests: reviewed, improved, corrected and reftested

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:17:22 -0400
Message-ID: <ed257d518cd993bd495e9620f8a3a0b5.squirrel@ed-sh-cp3.entirelydigital.com>
To: "Arron Eicholz" <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>

I have reviewed and reftested about 80 max-width-[001-108] tests.

At least 20 max-width-xxx tests authored by Microsoft were corrected
(according to the comments I made in Shepherd) and tweaked.

Most of the time, I have increased the set width (to at least twice the
amount set in max-width) which was to be constrained by max-width in the




line 15: max-width: 1px;
line 16: width: 2px;
line 21: <p>Test passes if there is a line below.</p>

If/when the line is 1px wide, then the test passes.
If/when the line is 2px wide, then the test passes too.



now has:

line 18: max-width: 1px;
line 19: width: 96px;
line 24: <p>Test passes if there is a thin vertical line.</p>

If/when there is a 1px wide line, then the test passes.
If/when there is a black 96px tall by 96px wide square, then the test
clearly fails.

Same kind of adjustments were made in 006, 007, 014, 017, 018, 025, 050,
051, 069, 080 tests. Also other max-width-xxx tests authored by
Microsoft were slightly modified, tuned for various reasons.

Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:

CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011:

CSS 2.1 test suite harness:

Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite:
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2012 23:17:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:25 UTC