W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Testing border-radius

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:58:20 -0400
Message-ID: <30223c50f18c22f1b834d14c000ff738.squirrel@ed-sh-cp3.entirelydigital.com>
To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org

Le Sam 27 octobre 2012 10:43, fantasai a écrit :
> On 10/21/2012 12:44 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
>> In Test the Web Forward@Beijing, it was mentioned that the tests
>> written
>> should fail even when the browser doesn't support that feature *at
>> all*.
>> I am wondering if this is necessary because it is not at all
>> straightforward how you do this for 'border-radius'.
>>
>> The idea I just suggested to a participant is to add something like
>>
>>    <div id="dummy">
>>      You would not see this if your browser supports 'border-radius'.
>>    </div>
>>
>>    #dummy {
>>      border-radius: 500em;
>>      width: 10000em;
>>      height: 10000em;
>>      overflow: hidden; /* the text would be clipped */
>>    }
>>
>> to the test and not to the reference, but as the name suggests, it's
>> quite dummy.
>>
>> Given all browsers support 'border-radius' without prefix now, is
>> something like the thingy above still necessary? And does anyone have
>> a
>> better idea?
>
> Use a mismatch reference. Same reference, but with border-radius: 0.
> If the reference matches, the UA fails.


Good idea! I agree.

Gérard
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011:
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite harness:
http://test.csswg.org/harness/

Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2012 18:58:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 27 October 2012 18:58:53 GMT