W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > November 2012

RE: background-size-contain/cover (RE: background-size-003 review)

From: Zhang, Zhiqiang <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 03:37:26 +0000
To: "Gérard Talbot" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
CC: "Public CSS testsuite mailing list@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, "Santos, Thiago" <thiago.santos@intel.com>, "Zhang, Haili" <haili.zhang@intel.com>, "Yu, Ling L" <ling.l.yu@intel.com>, "Yang, Lei A" <lei.a.yang@intel.com>
Message-ID: <0EA8FB2070816C499E0A50AC1B0B5C1620994D@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
> 
> Another formulation which could be better, I think, is:
> 
> <p>Test passes if there are 2 rows of 2 fully displayed cats, if there
> is no partially displayed cat and <strong>no red</strong>.</p>
> 
> ... or maybe
> 
> <p>Test passes if there are 2 rows of 2 cats, if there is no partially
> displayed cat and <strong>no red</strong>.</p>

This one sounds better :)

https://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/9bff5139495c

needs your approval

> 
> 
> because "clipped" and "sliced" are okay to qualify, to describe an image
> but not a "cat".
> 
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 03:37:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 November 2012 03:37:58 GMT