W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > May 2012

Re: [css3-values]

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 12:31:33 -0400
Message-ID: <d6bdb86dc344c6120cb9998afa9ee677.squirrel@ed-sh-cp3.entirelydigital.com>
To: "Tharp, Dave" <dtharp@quicinc.com>
Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>

Le Jeu 17 mai 2012 12:22, Tharp, Dave a écrit :
> http://samples.msdn.microsoft.com/ietestcenter/css3/valuesandunits/units-000.htm
>
> The test uses the "old" representation 'vm' instead of the unit 'vmin'
> required by the specification.  IE recognizes this unit, standards
> compliant browsers do not.
>
> See: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-values/#viewport-relative-lengths
>
> Suggest changing the test to use 'vmin' instead of 'vm'
>
> Regards,
>
> -Dave Tharp


Dave,

Such Microsoft test has not been submitted to the W3C.

Also, there is no CSS3 values and units test suite at W3C yet, so far:
http://test.csswg.org/suites/

I suggest to send your excellent and relevant feedback to IE blog;
frankly, I'm not sure where/how people are supposed to send feedback,
comments, reports to IE dev. team when newest CSS3 tests are wrong.

I also suggest that you always try to give a meaningful, descriptive but
short subject line to your email: eg
[CSS3 values] units-000 uses deprecated vm length unit instead of vmin

regards, Gérard
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011:
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite harness:
http://test.csswg.org/harness/

Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Saturday, 19 May 2012 16:32:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 19 May 2012 16:32:14 GMT