W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > December 2012

Re: [RC6] rgb(50%, ..., ...) or rgb(..., 50%, ...) or rgb(..., ..., 50%): fractional value!

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:07:07 -0500
Message-ID: <d602d9af4fdad53f1b65beaf82bdacef.squirrel@ed-sh-cp3.entirelydigital.com>
To: "Rebecca Hauck" <rhauck@adobe.com>
Cc: "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>, "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>

Le Jeu 13 décembre 2012 14:18, Rebecca Hauck a écrit :
>
>
> On 12/11/12 4:20 PM, "Gérard Talbot" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>Le Mar 11 décembre 2012 12:44, Rebecca Hauck a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/7/12 2:29 PM, "Gérard Talbot" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Le Ven 7 décembre 2012 15:55, Rebecca Hauck a écrit :
>>>>>
>>
>>[snipped]
>>
>>>>As far as I am concerned, we can do 3 (I'm happy with such option)
>>>> for
>>>>cases with rgb(1%) and rgb(99%) as I said in
>>>>
>>>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2012Dec/0012.ht
>>>>ml
>>>>
>>>>which is:
>>>>
>>>>"
>>>>3. Update the background-color cases to have 2 references one ref
>>>> that
>>>>is on either side of the value being defined.
>>>>"
>>>>
>>>>I think we only need to tune the following 8 tests (so that they have
>>>> 2
>>>>references on either side) by doing 3.:
>>>>
>>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co
>>>>lo
>>>>r-049.htm
>>>>
>>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co
>>>>lo
>>>>r-054.htm
>>>>
>>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co
>>>>lo
>>>>r-070.htm
>>>>
>>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co
>>>>lo
>>>>r-075.htm
>>>>
>>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co
>>>>lo
>>>>r-090.htm
>>>>
>>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co
>>>>lo
>>>>r-095.htm
>>>>
>>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co
>>>>lo
>>>>r-110.htm
>>>>
>>>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-co
>>>>lo
>>>>r-115.htm
>>>
>>> Ok, great!  We'll go with #3 for this set of tests. May I change the
>>> status of the others back to Approved or do you prefer to do it? It
>>> appears I have permission to that.
>>
>>
>>One issue here.
>>
>>Changeset: 4777:5211db770fe9
>>
>>I changed color-002 to color-063 tests so that they would be comparing
>>to an image reference and not to background-color.
>>
>>When Arron says:
>>
>>"
>>Though this only affects background-color cases really since those are
>>the only ones that have the precision problem since they are compared
>> to
>>the image. Note we should double check all the other cases to confirm
>>that they are not compared to other color formats.
>>"
>>
>>I believe he means color-002 to color-063 tests should be reverted to
>>what they were, that is comparing to background-color code.
>
> Yes, I agree given what how we decided to handle the rest of the tests.
> Would you like to make the changes in Shepherd or should I?

Please, you do it Rebecca!

Gérard

>
>
>>
>>Gérard
>>--
>>Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
>>http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/
>>
>>CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011:
>>http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html
>>
>>CSS 2.1 test suite harness:
>>http://test.csswg.org/harness/
>>
>>Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite:
>>http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contr
>>ibutions-css21-testsuite.html
>>
>
>


-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011:
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite harness:
http://test.csswg.org/harness/

Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 20:07:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 December 2012 20:07:41 GMT