W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > December 2012

Re: [RC6] rgb(50%, ..., ...) or rgb(..., 50%, ...) or rgb(..., ..., 50%): fractional value!

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 17:29:25 -0500
Message-ID: <a6901ea96747e0617d6768f68fa6af6b.squirrel@ed-sh-cp3.entirelydigital.com>
To: "Rebecca Hauck" <rhauck@adobe.com>
Cc: "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>, "Public CSS test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>

Le Ven 7 décembre 2012 15:55, Rebecca Hauck a écrit :
>
>>
>>If we were face-to-face or on the phone, it would be interesting to
>>discuss this. I don't necessarly disagree with you on everything.
>>
>

I should have been saying "I don't necessarly disagree with what you
said in the above paragraph." rather.

Arron said something in a paragraph which I thought could lead to a
rhetorical discussion or theoretical/academical discussion.
And we have lots of tests to update and review.


> Hi Gérard,
>
> We are planning on having another call to discuss the CSS21 test suite
> after the CSSWG call next Wednesday, December 12. Would you like to join
> us to discuss this? As I mentioned, this affects a large number of tests
> we want to clean up for the release, so it's very worthwhile to get a
> resolution soon.
>
> Thanks,
> -Rebecca

Rebecca,

As far as I am concerned, we can do 3 (I'm happy with such option) for
cases with rgb(1%) and rgb(99%) as I said in

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2012Dec/0012.html

which is:

"
3. Update the background-color cases to have 2 references one ref that
is on either side of the value being defined.
"

I think we only need to tune the following 8 tests (so that they have 2
references on either side) by doing 3.:

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-color-049.htm

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-color-054.htm

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-color-070.htm

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-color-075.htm

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-color-090.htm

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-color-095.htm

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-color-110.htm

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/background-color-115.htm

What I miss from the beginning is the pivoting transitivity between
*-color tests which was, it seems, an intentional, deliberate testing
design decision.

Phone calls are usually not favorable to me. First, there is lag. There
can be echo in the background. I may miss a few words which then makes
understanding sentences difficult. Or some words are unknown to me: eg.
"divvy up", "piece meal". All this slows the discussion, the group and
me. So, I prefer not to slow down conference phone calls.

Gérard
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011:
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite harness:
http://test.csswg.org/harness/

Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Friday, 7 December 2012 22:29:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 7 December 2012 22:30:01 GMT