W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > August 2012

Re: [css3-conditional] Submitted a few TCs

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 07:59:55 -0400
Message-ID: <c07f18568c536f7214ef60d1a98969e1.squirrel@ed-sh-cp3.entirelydigital.com>
To: "Florian Rivoal" <florianr@opera.com>
Cc: "Public CSS testsuite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>

Le Jeu 2 août 2012 8:22, Florian Rivoal a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I've submitted a few TCs for @supports in
> contributors/opera/submitted/css3-conditional/

http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/opera/submitted/css3-conditional/


Florian,

The nr 1 problem I see right now with those 33 tests is that 19 of them
will pass in browsers which have no implemention of @supports
conditional rule. So, these 19 tests have limited relevance, worthiness
and weak trustworthiness.

They could be improved to be more specific, better targeted; in some
tests, I do not know right now how they could be reworked, improved to
detect non-implementation of @supports.

Ideally, tests should fail when there is an incorrect implementation,
when there is a partial/incomplete implementation or when there is an
absence of implementation.


"
The test will not pass inadvertently
"
CSS Test Review Checklist: Test Design
http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/review-checklist#test-design

Gérard
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011:
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite harness:
http://test.csswg.org/harness/

Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Saturday, 4 August 2012 12:00:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 4 August 2012 12:00:40 GMT