W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Comments on [RC6] background-position-applies-to-004, vertical-align-117, vertical-align-118

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:58:45 -0400
Message-ID: <20111024085845.14842o127ija10xx@cp3.shieldhost.com>
To: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
Cc: Public CSS test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, Arron Eicholz <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>
Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> a écrit :

> On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:52:04 +0200, Gérard Talbot  
> <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org> wrote:
>> Argh... Forgot to say and wanted to add that Opera 11.52 fails
>> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/vertical-align-117a.html
> Looks OK to me (Windows 7 and Ubuntu 10.04), maybe you could file a  
> report with some more details?

Hello Øyvind,

I made a lot of tunings and tweakings to those testcases during the  
weekend. The failure I noticed was when using generic serif instead of  
Ahem. I'll have to recreate the testcase which did not quite pass in  
Opera 11.52. I am not absolutely sure that the small difference in  
rendering isn't allowed or granted thanks to section 10.6.1 which  
states "The height of the content area should be based on the font,  
but this specification does not specify how.".

> The TC guidelines say that "[i]n the absence of any red, green  
> indicates success", so the span should probably be blue color or  
> something instead of lime.

Excellent feedback! I have adopted your suggestion.

regards, Gérard
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:

CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011

CSS 2.1 test suite harness:
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 12:59:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:23 UTC