W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > November 2011

Re: [RC6] border conflict width: testing 'none' and 'hidden' versus narrower borders

From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:29:20 +0100
Message-ID: <4ECF5FF0.6040301@lachy.id.au>
To: css21testsuite@gtalbot.org
CC: Arron Eicholz <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>, Public CSS test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On 2011-11-23 20:57, "GĂ©rard Talbot" wrote:
> Hello Arron and Lachlan,
>
> Several tests, listed below, suggest (in their title and/or in their
> meta assert) that the wider border wins over narrower border even when
> 'border-style: none' and 'border-style: hidden' are involved ... which
> is not true. Even a 'border: red hidden 0px' should always prevail over
> any other borders. Even a 'border: red none 100px' should always lose
> over any non-zero narrow border.
>
> Border conflict resolution where wider border wins over narrower border
> is true only when border-style 'hidden' or 'none' is not involved
> between 2 borders.
>
> Lachlan testcases (25 testcases)
> -----------------
>
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/border-conflict-w-001.htm
>
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/border-conflict-w-002.htm
> ...

I don't understand what you mean.  The title isn't meant to suggest 
which border wins.  It's only an indication of the part of the algorithm 
is being tested.  The pass conditions in each of the tests indicates 
which border should win, and they seem to be correct.

-- 
Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software
http://lachy.id.au/
http://www.opera.com/
Received on Friday, 25 November 2011 09:29:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 25 November 2011 09:29:57 GMT