W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > March 2011

Re: RC3 font-size-091

From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:21:21 +0100
To: "Arron Eicholz" <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.vr4ydvw6bunlto@oyvinds-desktop>
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:20:51 +0100, Arron Eicholz  
<Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 1:59 PM Gérard Talbot wrote:

>> Would it be possible to use a larger value than 1%.., say 10% or 20% ?
>> Is there a particular reason as to why 1% has to be used, tested?
>>
>
> The reason for 1% or 1px or -1px etc... is I am testing boundary cases  
> for all scenarios.

Could the TC explicitly state the "no minimum font size" assumption, maybe  
asking the tester to disable the setting if there is one? (Fourth  
"uncommon assumption" listed in  
<http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110111/>)

-- 
Øyvind Stenhaug
Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 16:21:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 10 March 2011 16:22:05 GMT