W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > January 2011

Re: split of dynamic-top-change-005

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:39:28 -0500
Message-ID: <4D41F420.5000008@mit.edu>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org, fantasai@inkedblade.net
On 1/27/11 5:35 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> Here is a diff for two *additional* tests that split
> dynamic-top-change-005 into two tests, with the intent that we add
> these additional tests without removing the original, so that we can
> make a better argument about the failures being independent bugs,
> and therefore argue that the lack of two independent implementations
> is not a sign of lack of implementability.
> (In particular, WebKit should still fail both halves of the split,
> but Opera should pass 005a (I tested this), IE9 should pass 005b (I
> did not test this), and Gecko should pass both in addition to the
> original.)
> Since this test is in the approved/ folder, I believe I need
> reviews.

So we'd have 5, 5a, 5b after this change?  That seems fine to me.

Received on Thursday, 27 January 2011 22:40:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:22 UTC