W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > January 2011

RE: [RC3] containing-block-017 and containing-block-003 not testing what they are supposed to test

From: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 00:11:06 +0000
To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
CC: "css21testsuite@gtalbot.org" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <07349ECFC3608F48BC3B10459913E70B12B1726D@TK5EX14MBXC140.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
On Thursday, December 30, 2010 10:53 PM Alan Gresley wrote:
> On 31/12/2010 5:36 PM, Alan Gresley wrote:
> > On 31/12/2010 4:46 PM, Alan Gresley wrote:
> >
> >> Now let me ponder some real world case of this and see what results.
> >
> >
> > <http://css-class.com/test/temp/containing-block-inline.htm>
> >
> >
> > I believe it is Safari 5 that shows the test correctly. The rtl test
> > causes various issues in IE9, Opera 11 and FF 3.6.13 (Gecko 1.9). I
> > don't have FF 4b to test in.
> 
> 
> A more refined case where corners meet.
> 
> <http://css-class.com/test/temp/containing-block-inline2.htm>
> 
> 
> And a reference image of correct rendering.
> 
> <http://css-class.com/test/temp/containing-block-inline2.png>
> 

Alan, I really liked your test case so I added you as an author for the updated case and as you can now see both containing-block-017 and 018 are very similar to your example case. Thank  you for the great example case.

These edits should be in RC5.

--
Thanks,
Arron Eicholz
Received on Saturday, 8 January 2011 00:11:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 8 January 2011 00:13:09 GMT