W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > February 2011

Re: split of dynamic-top-change-005

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:02:08 -0800
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, public-css-testsuite@w3.org, fantasai@inkedblade.net
Message-ID: <20110202170208.GB1239@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Wednesday 2011-02-02 01:05 -0800, fantasai wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 02:39 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> >On 1/27/11 5:35 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> >>Here is a diff for two *additional* tests that split
> >>dynamic-top-change-005 into two tests, with the intent that we add
> >>these additional tests without removing the original, so that we can
> >>make a better argument about the failures being independent bugs,
> >>and therefore argue that the lack of two independent implementations
> >>is not a sign of lack of implementability.
> >>
> >>(In particular, WebKit should still fail both halves of the split,
> >>but Opera should pass 005a (I tested this), IE9 should pass 005b (I
> >>did not test this), and Gecko should pass both in addition to the
> >>original.)
> >>
> >>Since this test is in the approved/ folder, I believe I need
> >>reviews.
> >
> >So we'd have 5, 5a, 5b after this change? That seems fine to me.
> 
> Looks ok to me, too.

Landed: http://test.csswg.org/svn-view?view=revision&revision=1819

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 17:02:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 2 February 2011 17:02:57 GMT