W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > February 2011

Re: Wording of text-transform-bicameral-*

From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:21:30 +0100
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: CSS-testsuite <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vp9wh4u6bunlto@oyvinds-desktop>
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:26:48 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>  
> wrote:
>> Another potential issue is that the characters will be exactly  
>> identical if
>> no suitable font is found and a replacement character is rendered  
>> instead.
>> Should probably also clarify that each pair should be different from  
>> all the
>> other pairs.
>
> The note at the bottom of those tests implies that seeing the
> replacement character is an error.  Is that enough?

Yeah, maybe. Though it requires the observer to realize that rectangles  
all over the place means "unable to see font glyphs".

It was kind of a hypothetical issue mentioned in passing anyway. The main  
thing is the "matches" phrasing.

-- 
Øyvind Stenhaug
Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 11:22:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 2 February 2011 11:22:14 GMT