W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > September 2010

RE: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:04:32 +0000
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
CC: Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E27E6054F@TK5EX14MBXC115.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> From: Simon Fraser [mailto:smfr@me.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 4:45 PM
> To: Sylvain Galineau
> Cc: Geoffrey Sneddon; Anne van Kesteren; L. David Baron; John Jansen;
> fantasai; Arron Eicholz; public-css-testsuite@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Conversion of MS CSS 2.1 tests to reftests
> 
> On Sep 28, 2010, at 4:38 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
> 
> >> From: Simon Fraser [mailto:smfr@me.com]
> >>
> >> Apple has not run the test suite in full. I've done about 25% of the
> >> tests so far.
> >
> > You said on Sunday that "I've been through about 60% of the HTML4
> tests
> > in the 20100917 suite, and have some feedback". I guess I was over-
> optimistic
> > about what 'going through' meant :)
> 
> Half of the HTML4 tests is 25% of the entire suite. The half vs. 60%
> number is because
> I need to go back to look at skipped tests.
> 
> Is this a good time to question the need to run every single test in
> both HTML4 and XHTML1 formats?

I was just going to ask.
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 00:06:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 29 September 2010 00:06:51 GMT