- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:46:09 -0700
- To: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Hello all, http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/absolute-replaced-width-007.htm <title> is: Absolute replaced elements and 'auto' specified for 'margin-left', 'margin-right' and percentage intrinsic width that cannot be resolved Assert says: Percentage intrinsic widths are evaluated against the containing block's width unless the containing block width depends on the element. Spec quotes: "lengths expressed as percentages [for the height or width HTML attribute for <img>] are based on the horizontal or vertical space currently available, not on the natural size of the image, object, or applet. " http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/objects.html#adef-width-IMG "Percentage intrinsic widths are first evaluated with respect to the containing block's width, if that width does not itself depend on the replaced element's width. If it does, then the resulting layout is undefined in CSS 2.1." http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#inline-replaced-width I believe that such test http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/absolute-replaced-width-007.htm is invalid, incorrect. We have rejected other similar testcases for the same reason: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/floats-148.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/blocks-023.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/blocks-024.htm There are also 2 other testcases with, for practical reasons, the same relevant code: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/absolute-replaced-width-014.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/absolute-replaced-width-021.htm and they also should be rejected IMO. regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (RC1; September 17th 2010): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Friday, 24 September 2010 05:46:44 UTC