- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:27:44 +0200
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "John Jansen" <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>, "Sylvain Galineau" <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Geoffrey Sneddon" <gsneddon@opera.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "Arron Eicholz" <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:31:39 +0200, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: > If that were the case, it would be helpful for you to at least say so > clearly and unambiguously. I do think test automation is way more valuable than putting a lot of effort into running this manually. Apparently we already did the work for the HTML set of tests, but keeping those up to date is more work than it would be if we had reftests. Unfortunately I was not present at this F2F discussion everyone keeps referring to, but I do not think it is worth it to try rushing to REC while the test suite is in the state it is in. That does not at all seem like a productive use of time of our collective resources. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 12:28:40 UTC