- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:47:49 -0700
- To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>
> On 08/25/2010 06:10 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
>>
>> Section 8.5 (partial) review report
>> ===================================
(...)
>> ----------------------
>>
>> Author: Ian Hickson
>>
>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100815/html4/c5517-brdr-s-000.htm
>>
>> The left and right borders are rather short: so, e.g., it may make
>> verifying the type of borders (left border and right border) difficult
>> a
>> bit in some sentences. E.g.:<p class="nine">(...) Blue and grooved on
>> the left and right. The left and right borders are only 16px tall and
>> 3px wide. There is very little chance realistically that a human would
>> be able to say that such elft and right borders are groove and not
>> ridge.
>>
>> Suggestion: add p {padding: 1em;} so that left and right borders
>> height
>> change from 16px to 48px and increase border-width everywhere, from
>> thick to 12px or 16px or more.
>
> Good idea. Added.
>
>> Author: Ian Hickson
http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/src/css1/c5517-brdr-s-000.htm
It is still difficult to compare groove and ridge when border-width is
thick. Increasing border-width (to, say, 10px) for groove and ridge
would help the bus driver or neighbour checking that test. :)
regards, Gérard
--
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/
CSS 2.1 test suite (beta 3; August 15th 2010):
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100815/html4/toc.html
CSS 2.1 test suite contributors:
http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Thursday, 16 September 2010 03:48:27 UTC