W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2010

Re: font-family-rule-002 invalid

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:19:43 -0700
To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Cc: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <20101018171943.GA4109@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Monday 2010-10-18 10:15 -0700, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Monday 2010-10-18 10:14 -0700, L. David Baron wrote:
> > These tests:
> > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/font-family-rule-002.htm
> > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/xhtml1/font-family-rule-002.xht
> > are invalid because they request a font call "White Space" but the
> > provided Ahem Extra package of fonts contains a font whose name
> > records all say "WhiteSpace" without a space.
> 
> This also means font-family-rule-009 is not testing what it was
> intended to test.

And
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/font-matching-rule-010.htm 
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/xhtml1/font-matching-rule-010.xht 
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/font-matching-rule-013.htm 
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/xhtml1/font-matching-rule-013.xht 
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/font-matching-rule-014.htm 
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/xhtml1/font-matching-rule-014.xht 
are also invalid due to equivalent mistakes in the name records of
the fonts.

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 17:20:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 18 October 2010 17:20:19 GMT