- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:19:43 -0700
- To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
- Cc: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
On Monday 2010-10-18 10:15 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > On Monday 2010-10-18 10:14 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > > These tests: > > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/font-family-rule-002.htm > > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/xhtml1/font-family-rule-002.xht > > are invalid because they request a font call "White Space" but the > > provided Ahem Extra package of fonts contains a font whose name > > records all say "WhiteSpace" without a space. > > This also means font-family-rule-009 is not testing what it was > intended to test. And http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/font-matching-rule-010.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/xhtml1/font-matching-rule-010.xht http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/font-matching-rule-013.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/xhtml1/font-matching-rule-013.xht http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/font-matching-rule-014.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/xhtml1/font-matching-rule-014.xht are also invalid due to equivalent mistakes in the name records of the fonts. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 17:20:13 UTC