W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2010

Re: cascade-precedence-001/002/003/004/005/006/007 invalid

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 04:32:47 -0700
Message-ID: <eb341371e6ba4745a504635f57c9841e.squirrel@cp3.shieldhost.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>

> On Thursday 2010-10-14 19:43 -0700, "GĂ©rard Talbot" wrote:
>> I could replace those testcases with testing the B element as follows
>> too:
>>
>> div {font-weight: normal;}
>>
>> <div><b>This text should be bold</b></div>
>>
>> but then again there is no requirement in CSS spec to style b element
>> as
>> 'font-weight: bold' and to do so in the user agent stylesheet.
>
> Yes, but that's a lot less controversial since it doesn't actually
> contradict other W3C specs.
>
> (Testing th elements contradicts
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/rendering.html#alignment .)

David,

All done now. Revision version 1503.

http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/gtalbot/submitted/cascade-precedence-001.htm

http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/gtalbot/submitted/cascade-precedence-001.xht

http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/gtalbot/submitted/cascade-precedence-002.htm

http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/gtalbot/submitted/cascade-precedence-002.xht

The other 5 testcases cascade-precedence-00?.xht have been removed.

regards, Gérard
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 test suite (RC2; October 1st 2010):
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite contributors:
http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Friday, 15 October 2010 11:33:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 15 October 2010 11:33:30 GMT