- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:35:56 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
> These tests: > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/c43-rpl-bbx-000.xht > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/c43-rpl-bbx-001.xht > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/c43-rpl-bbx-000.htm > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/c43-rpl-bbx-001.htm > have an incorrect pass condition. They say that there should be a > "big teal square", but in reality this square has an aqua border > around the edge. And since this is a highly-upscaled image, the > aqua border's edge might be a bit blurry. In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Jan/0034.html I also reported this aqua border problem: "Most testers would also assume that the teal square does not include the aqua belt (thick border) around the teal square. Or they wouldn't be sure." I also asked: 1- How does the tester know *_for sure_* that the teal square is [accurately] half the width of the window? 2- How would the tester know that the teal square is not 53% or not 48% of the width of the window? The thing is it could be off by 3 or 4 pixels and no one (except a machine checking pixels) would know that. regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (RC2; October 1st 2010): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 18:36:31 UTC