Re: bidi-alt-001 probably invalid

On Tuesday 2010-10-05 17:59 -0700, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
> > I don't think the text in
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#propdef-unicode-bidi is
> > precise enough to imply that unicode-bidi, applied to an img, must
> > affect that img's alternate text.  This is particularly true since
> > images are replaced elements, and Chapter 3 describes replaced
> > elements as outside the scope of the CSS formatting model.
> 
> 
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/bidi-alt-001.htm

> Then such verdict/policy should apply to other testcases trying to style
> the alternate text as well.
> 
> When I reviewed inlines-009.htm and inlines-010.htm, I said

Agreed.

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/