W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2010

Re: bidi-alt-001 probably invalid

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 18:13:27 -0700
To: "Gérard Talbot" <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Message-ID: <20101006011327.GB31261@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Tuesday 2010-10-05 17:59 -0700, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
> > I don't think the text in
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#propdef-unicode-bidi is
> > precise enough to imply that unicode-bidi, applied to an img, must
> > affect that img's alternate text.  This is particularly true since
> > images are replaced elements, and Chapter 3 describes replaced
> > elements as outside the scope of the CSS formatting model.
> 
> 
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/bidi-alt-001.htm

> Then such verdict/policy should apply to other testcases trying to style
> the alternate text as well.
> 
> When I reviewed inlines-009.htm and inlines-010.htm, I said

Agreed.

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2010 01:14:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 October 2010 01:14:37 GMT