W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2010

Re: Tests that should mention antialiasing effects for "no red"

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:41:30 -0700
To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Message-ID: <20101005004130.GA13694@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Monday 2010-10-04 16:35 -0700, L. David Baron wrote:
> The following 28 tests say that no red must be visible on the page.
> However, it's entirely normal to have red on the page as a result of
> antialising effects, since it's the drawing of black text on top of
> red text.  (In these cases, particularly so, since the text is
> the Ahem font in italic style.)
> 
> Some of the other tests with "no red" mention antialising effects,
> but these don't, and therefore I interpret the tests to (a) fail in
> Firefox and (b) be invalid, and I am marking them as such in my
> implementation report.
> 
> 
> (I'd also note that I now have images for all of the noninteractive
> tests, and a script to score unique images, starting with the most
> common ones, at
> http://hg.mozilla.org/users/dbaron_mozilla.com/css21-implementation-report/ .)

This also applies to the following 8 tests (which have a different
image):

html4/font-006.htm
html4/font-009.htm
html4/font-022.htm
html4/font-025.htm
xhtml1/font-006.xht
xhtml1/font-009.xht
xhtml1/font-022.xht
xhtml1/font-025.xht

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2010 00:41:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 October 2010 00:42:08 GMT