On Oct 3, 2010, at 1:16 pm, Gérard Talbot wrote: >> On Oct 3, 2010, at 12:20 pm, Gérard Talbot wrote: >> >>>> When I compare the HTML4 and XHTML1 tests in the 20101001 zip file, I >>> find many tests missing from the html4 directory, and some in html4 >>> that >>>> are not in xhtml1 (I'm not sure how many are expected to differ): >>>> Only >>> in html4/ Only in xhtml1/ >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> (...) >>> >>>> overflow-html-body-001 >>> >>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/overflow-html-body-001.htm >>> >>> That overflow-html-body-001 testcase should not be in XHTML too and it >>> is properly marked with >>> >>> <meta name="flags" content="HTMLonly"> >>> >>> I have not checked about the others. >> >> Indeed, all the tests I listed that are only present in html/ have the >> HTMLonly flag. So that leaves the following, which are missing from >> html4/: >> >> absolute-replaced-height-006 > > Simon, > > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/absolute-replaced-height-006.xht > > That absolute-replaced-height-006 testcase has : > > <meta name="flags" content="nonHTML svg" /> Ah, I was failing to take that flag into account. I verified that there are, indeed, no unexpected missing tests. SimonReceived on Monday, 4 October 2010 01:26:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 October 2010 01:26:30 GMT