W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2010

Re: 20101001: missing tests (false alarm)

From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 13:22:51 -0700
Cc: "Public CSS 2.1 test suite mailing list" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-id: <E78EA9D3-EE67-4185-8867-0AC65472944B@me.com>
To: css21testsuite@gtalbot.org
On Oct 3, 2010, at 1:16 pm, Gérard Talbot wrote:

>> On Oct 3, 2010, at 12:20 pm, Gérard Talbot wrote:
>> 
>>>> When I compare the HTML4 and XHTML1 tests in the 20101001 zip file, I
>>> find many tests missing from the html4 directory, and some in html4
>>> that
>>>> are not in xhtml1 (I'm not sure how many are expected to differ):
>>>> Only
>>> in html4/                Only in xhtml1/
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> (...)
>>> 
>>>> overflow-html-body-001
>>> 
>>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/overflow-html-body-001.htm
>>> 
>>> That overflow-html-body-001 testcase should not be in XHTML too and it
>>> is properly marked with
>>> 
>>> <meta name="flags" content="HTMLonly">
>>> 
>>> I have not checked about the others.
>> 
>> Indeed, all the tests I listed that are only present in html/ have the
>> HTMLonly flag. So that leaves the following, which are missing from
>> html4/:
>> 
>> absolute-replaced-height-006
> 
> Simon,
> 
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/absolute-replaced-height-006.xht
> 
> That absolute-replaced-height-006 testcase has :
> 
>      <meta name="flags" content="nonHTML svg" />

Ah, I was failing to take that flag into account.

I verified that there are, indeed, no unexpected missing tests.

Simon
Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 01:26:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 October 2010 01:26:30 GMT