W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2010

Re: CSS2.1 Test Suite RC2 Release Notes

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 15:18:07 -0700
Message-ID: <a271159ad3fe13a47e4aa7acc39548ae.squirrel@cp3.shieldhost.com>
To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, "Arron Eicholz" <arron.eicholz@microsoft.com>

> There is a new wiki page to help us track issues:
>    http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/issues
> Please help us track error reports there!
>
> The following tests have significant substantive changes:
>    absolute-non-replaced-width-008
>    absolute-non-replaced-width-009

(...)

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/absolute-non-replaced-width-008.htm
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/absolute-non-replaced-width-009.htm

The title, the assert, the expected results and the code design of those
absolute-non-replaced-width-008 , 009 are still wrong, incorrect.
The only change I see is that #div1 is now width: 3in;


>    display-applies-to-002
(...)


http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/display-applies-to-002.htm

That testcase has not been updated or corrected as far as I can see.
<abbr> is already, by default and by the spec, an inline element. So,
the testcase does not test what it meant to test to begin with.

I have proposed a replacement for display-applies-to-002.htm


>    left-091
>    left-092
(...)

left-091 and left-092 are now better but I think the testcases should
not be creating unexpectedly an horizontal scrollbar.

>    position-relative-nested-001
(...)

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/position-relative-nested-001.htm

The proposed replacement was adopted ... but now the original/initial
test assert does not make sense. The code I provided was incidently
demonstrating that 'background-position: center center;' is not the same
as (and can not be considered as an equivalent of) 'top: 50%' or
'bottom: 50%;' or 'top: -50%' or 'bottom: 50%'. Relative positioning
will position *the top of* padding-box at 50% while background-position
will position *in the middle of* the padding box at 50%.



> The following tests were renamed:
>    dinamic-pseudo-classes-* to dynamic-pseudo-classes-*
>    counter-reset-increment-002 was renamed from something

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/counter-reset-increment-002.htm
was
  inspired by
http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/css/box/list/list-style-type/002.html
  and by
  http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/html4/list-style-type-017.htm

regards, Gérard
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 test suite (RC2; October 1st 2010):
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite contributors:
http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Sunday, 3 October 2010 22:18:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 3 October 2010 22:18:55 GMT