W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > November 2010

Re: [RC3] content-160

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:59:14 -0700
Message-ID: <d1fc8394819b4fda8fc407e7b33ff045.squirrel@cp3.shieldhost.com>
To: "Řyvind Stenhaug" <oyvinds@opera.com>
Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>

Le Ven 5 novembre 2010 12:48, "Gérard Talbot" a écrit :


> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/content-160.htm [RC2]
>
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101027/html4/content-160.htm [RC3]
>
> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_12/content-160.htm
>
> http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_12/content-160.xht

> I would remove
>                 background: white;
>                 color: white;
> declarations from #div1 ruleset since they play no role (and should have
> 0 impact, 0 influence) in the testcase.

I understand now why these 'background: white;' and 'color: white;' were
declared: in CSS 3, content applies to all elements and Opera 10.x
(Presto 2.3) supports this already. So, these background: white; and
color: white; make sense.

I still think content-160 is a valid and correct testcase though.

regards, Gérard
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 test suite (RC3; October 27th 2010):
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101027/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite contributors:
http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 20:59:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 5 November 2010 20:59:55 GMT