W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > May 2010

Re: ident-003 should be marked invalid, no?

From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 21:45:26 +0200
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: public-css-testsuite <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-Id: <201005272145.27226.bert@w3.org>
On Thursday 27 May 2010 00:10:30 Dan Connolly wrote:
> In
> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/20100316/xhtml1/ident-003.xht
>
> we find:
>
>   .three { color: green; background: white; }
>   .-1ident, .three { color: red; }
>
> The test says the class="three" element should be green;
> surely this is because the ruleset starting .-1ident
> is thrown out as invalid, yes?

Correct.

(More precisely, it is reserved syntax that could in theory become valid 
one day. Not very likely, though.)

So yes, this test case needs the "invalid" flag.



Bert
-- 
  Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
  http://www.w3.org/people/bos                               W3C/ERCIM
  bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
  +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Thursday, 27 May 2010 19:44:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:52:02 GMT