W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > June 2010

Re: CSS2.1 Test Suite Alpha 3 Published

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:56:07 -0700
Message-ID: <6b590333b88b536b720391a190b0f706.squirrel@cp3.shieldhost.com>
To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>

> CSS2.1 Test Suite Alpha 3 has been published:
>    http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/


> Please review the test suite and submit feedback to
> public-css-testsuite@w3.org. (Follow-ups set.)


Fantasai,

1-

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/html4/overflow-applies-to-001.htm

to

http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/html4/overflow-applies-to-015.htm

Those webpages all use the following doctype declaration

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD//XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">

which should be rather/instead

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">

(notice the extras "//" between DTD and XHTML)

overflow-applies-to-001.htm to overflow-applies-to-015.htm
all have some 30 validation markup errors.

W3C validator reports more:

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/html4/overflow-applies-to-001.htm

"
This document uses an inconsistent DOCTYPE declaration. The System
Identifier http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd declares
the XHTML 1.0 Strict document type, but the associated Public Identifier
-//W3C//DTD//XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN does not match this document type.

The recommended Public Identifier for
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd is -//W3C//DTD XHTML
1.0 Strict//EN.
"

The problem is the same with
http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_11/overflow-applies-to-001.xht

to

http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/submitted/Chapter_11/overflow-applies-to-015.xht

Ref.:
http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/format#template-for-new-tests


2-
a) The Chrome 6.0.427.0 dev application will hang (and CPU activity
increases dramatically and stays high) when entering chapter pages or
page with #fragment

b) Other browsers (Konqueror 4.4.4) have repainting problem once you
clicked a [+] to expand a sub-section (say section 8.3.1). The links to
testcases have to be hovered in order to be painted. This particular
issue may not be the responsibility of the testsuite webpage but may
have to do with the browser itself.

e.g.:
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/html4/chapter-8.html#s8.3.1

c) None of the browsers tested so far collapse an expanded section
marked with a [+] when re-clicking on it. Maybe this was intended.

regards, Gérard
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 test suite (alpha 3; June 15th 2010):
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100615/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite contributors:
http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2010 17:56:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:52:02 GMT