W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > July 2010

RE: [CSS 2.1] Invalid test cases

From: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:20:24 +0000
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DD511CF6D0DA5A428D4E7C6F459BD7AB13C12770@TK5EX14MBXC138.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
On 7/26/2010 6:27 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 7/26/10 4:49 PM, Arron Eicholz wrote:
> > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/run-in-fixedpos-bet
> > ween-001.htm
> >
> > class defined on element is "fixed" but style block has "fixedpos".
> > Looks like a simple naming issue.
> 
> Yep.  This was actually reported about a week ago to me, and I had the fix
> ready to go, but then the tests svn repository was ... not accepting checkins.
> 
> I just checked in a fix in revision 1273.

Excellent thanks.

> 
> > I think we should just remove these cases, any objections?:
> >
> > (I plan to remove cases on 7/29 if there are no objections.)
> >
> > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/active-selector-000
> > .htm
> >
> > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/c5504-mrgn-l-002.ht
> > m
> >
> > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/c61-phys-len-000.ht
> > m
> >
> > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/floats-107.htm
> >
> > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/units-007.htm
> 
> These 5 are the ones you want to remove, right?
> 

Yes, I think these cases can be removed. Unless you, or anyone, think they are valid or there is a fix. I am planning on removing them later this week if there are no arguments about removing them from anyone.

--
Thanks,
Arron Eicholz
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2010 03:21:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:52:02 GMT