W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > January 2010

Re: t1504-c543-txt-decor-00-d-g.htm: text-decoration description ambiguous

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:45:16 -0800
Message-ID: <4B5D763C.5030500@inkedblade.net>
To: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On 02/27/2009 06:18 PM, Arron Eicholz wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/html4/t1504-c543-txt-decor-00-d-g.htm
>
> Here is the markup for the fourth test from the bottom:
>
> <p>  There should be no red at the end of this line.<strong class="one">  </strong>&nbsp;</p>
>
> The relevant CSS is:
>
> .one {text-decoration: underline;}
>
> However, CSS2.1 states [1]:
>
> "Underlines, overlines, and line-throughs are applied only to text
> (including white space, letter spacing, and word spacing): margins,
> borders, and padding are skipped. If an element contains no text,
> user agents must refrain from rendering these text decorations on
> the element. For example, images will not be underlined."
>
> We interpret this as requiring this space to be underlined.
>
> The test case is currently invalid and needs to be updated to match
> the current spec that states white space should be underlined.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/text.html#propdef-text-decoration

Fixed. Let me know if this is ok:
   http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/archive/raw-tests/css1tests/css1test543.xml

~fantasai
Received on Monday, 25 January 2010 10:45:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:52:01 GMT