W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > December 2010

Re: HTML tests? (html-attribute-*/html-precedence-*)

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 04:23:01 -0500
Message-ID: <4CFDFCF5.4060409@inkedblade.net>
To: Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>
CC: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On 09/25/2010 04:41 PM, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
> Hey,
> Looking through tests with incorrect metadata, I came across the html-attribute-* and html-precedence-* tests. As far as I can
> tell, they are all valid for XHTML too, seeming the interesting part in that case is only when the stylesheets are in the user
> style sheet per spec (which is html-precedence-003). The name seems a bit confusing, but the cost of renaming tests now seems
> to high, oh well…
> That said, html-attribute-029 should be fixed not to point to a 404 link in the XHTML copy of the testsuite.
> Looking at the spec, it appears the tests should have the "may" flag in HTML and the "should" flag in XHTML. fantasai, any
> idea of what to do with that?

Unless stated otherwise, I would interpret the spec's statement
about HTML documents to include the XML serialization of HTML,
i.e. XHTML. They should not be behaving differently here imo.

Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2010 09:23:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:22 UTC