- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 04:23:01 -0500
- To: Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>
- CC: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On 09/25/2010 04:41 PM, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote: > Hey, > > Looking through tests with incorrect metadata, I came across the html-attribute-* and html-precedence-* tests. As far as I can > tell, they are all valid for XHTML too, seeming the interesting part in that case is only when the stylesheets are in the user > style sheet per spec (which is html-precedence-003). The name seems a bit confusing, but the cost of renaming tests now seems > to high, oh well… > > That said, html-attribute-029 should be fixed not to point to a 404 link in the XHTML copy of the testsuite. > > Looking at the spec, it appears the tests should have the "may" flag in HTML and the "should" flag in XHTML. fantasai, any > idea of what to do with that? Unless stated otherwise, I would interpret the spec's statement about HTML documents to include the XML serialization of HTML, i.e. XHTML. They should not be behaving differently here imo. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2010 09:23:38 UTC