Re: bidi-breaking-002 probably invalid (items 3 and 4)

On 10/14/2010 01:46 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
> I think tests 3 and 4 (out of the 5) in
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/bidi-breaking-002.xht
> are probably invalid, since section 16.6 lists the possible
> representations of newlines in text to be formatted in CSS, and LS
> and PS are not among them.
>
> If they need to be among them, then 16.6.1 also needs significant
> revision.

I've split this test into two parts based on the WG resolution:
bidi-breaking-002 and bidi-breaking-003, which will be optional ("may")

~fantasai