- From: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:00:59 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
> From: public-css-testsuite-request@w3.org [mailto:public-css-testsuite-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of fantasai
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 11:57 AM
> To: Øyvind Stenhaug
> Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
> Subject: Re: border-collapse-inherited-001 makes invalid assumptions about
> UA style sheet
>
> On 10/23/2010 12:49 AM, fantasai wrote:
> > On 10/18/2010 06:57 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug wrote:
> >> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:09:22 +0200, L. David Baron
> >> <dbaron@dbaron.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/border-collapse-
> >>> inherited-001.xht
> >>>
> >>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/border-collapse-i
> >>> nherited-001.htm
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> These tests make invalid assumptions about the UA style sheet; in
> >>> particular that it does not have the rule:
> >>> table { border-collapse: separate }
> >> (...)
> >>> This test should be removed.
> >>
> >> I guess it could also have another div between the #container and the
> >> table, and then
> >>
> >> table { border-collapse: inherit }
> >
> > That's a good idea. It could also use an alternate path with
> > <div>-based tables, which should not be affected by such reset rules.
>
> You could also make the failure more obvious by
> a) increasing the border-spacing some more
> b) giving the table box a red background
Increased border-spacing added red background
--
Thanks,
Arron Eicholz
Received on Friday, 3 December 2010 18:01:32 UTC