- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 10:15:46 -0700
- To: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
> Hello all, > > List of questionable testcases on font and vertical-align: (...) > 6- > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/20100727/html4/vertical-align-115.htm > > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/20100727/html4/vertical-align-116.htm > > I have explained why these tests are incorrect in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Feb/0030.html Correct links in beta 2: Vertical-align with a keyword, 'sub' http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100727/html4/vertical-align-115.htm Vertical-align with a keyword, 'super' http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100727/html4/vertical-align-116.htm 7- Vertical-align: text-top; meta-test http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100727/html4/c544-valgn-002.htm Vertical-align: middle; meta-test http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100727/html4/c544-valgn-003.htm Vertical-align: top; meta-test http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100727/html4/c544-valgn-004.htm These 3 tests are questionable because the user has to compare vertical alignment on several elements, without reliable (pixel accuracy) mean. It would be easier if there was only 1 background image where all the image top would be aligned. The 'vertical-align: middle' meta-test c544-valgn-003.htm is definitely more questionable: your neighbour, your bus driver, etc.. would have a difficult time trying to establish if that test is passed in several browsers. I just think there ought to be a better way for an human user to test, vertify accuracy and compliance in those tests. -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (beta 2; July 27th 2010): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100727/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Monday, 2 August 2010 17:16:22 UTC