W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Contribution of Mozilla reftests

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:19:48 -0700
Message-ID: <4ABABB24.2050608@inkedblade.net>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
L. David Baron wrote:
> On Tuesday 2009-09-15 21:06 -0700, L. David Baron wrote:
>> An initial contribution of Mozilla reftests towards the CSS
>> 2.1 test suite is contained in:
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Sep/att-0034/moztests.zip
> 
> Here's an updated version of this archive, now with 193 test
> assertions.   It includes a newer version of the block-inside-inline
> tests that I wasn't aware of, and also some border collapsing tests
> that I got licensing permission for after I sent the message last
> night.
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Sep/att-0042/moztests.zip
> 
> To be clear, these tests are provided under either of the licenses
> in http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2008/04-testsuite-copyright

Ok, I've checked the tests into svn at
   http://test.csswg.org/svn/contributors/mozilla/incoming/reftests/
You should have access to the repository already; ping me if you've
lost your password.

Initial comments from a random audit:

   1. 'opacity' is not a CSS2.1 property
   2. HTML is not an acceptable format for CSS2.1 tests, please convert
      to valid XHTML (1.1 or 1.0).
   3. The metadata for the table backgrounds test doesn't seem to make
      any sense; they're all linked to the anonymous boxes section.
   4. Do you have a plan for keeping these tests in sync with Mozilla's
      copy? Or do you not care about that?

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 00:20:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:51:58 GMT