W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > March 2009

RE: attribute-value-selector-004.xht not well formed

From: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:06:20 -0700
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <66D5CB5D6AB0694592FAF5487C50368B29B58CDC0E@NA-EXMSG-C111.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
No I am testing if it selects not if it is going through error handling. Error handling is a different case all together in a different chapter. This rule is in Chapter 5 which is specifically about selectors and selection. The case is testing for that selection if the attribute in the HTML was actually valid would the attribute selector that matches (even though it is invalid) still match? This is what needs to be tested in this case. Error handling is in Chapter 4 and should also test a similar case, but in that case it should be specifically testing for the rule to be thrown out.

--
Thanks,
Arron Eicholz


-----Original Message-----
From: public-css-testsuite-request@w3.org [mailto:public-css-testsuite-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of L. David Baron
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:48 AM
To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Subject: Re: attribute-value-selector-004.xht not well formed

On Tuesday 2009-03-10 09:35 -0700, Arron Eicholz wrote:
> I totally get all of your arguments but we need to test the rule
> and the rule is not about error handling it's about numbers at the
> beginning of IDENTS. Error handling cases are different cases and
> have different tests.

I don't see the distinction.  A number at the beginning of an ident
is an error, and you're testing how it's handled... and in
particular, that it's treated as an error.

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 17:07:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:51:57 GMT