W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > April 2009

Re: <link rel=reviewer>

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:18:39 -0700
Message-ID: <49EF5F7F.9080505@inkedblade.net>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> During the CSS WG we discussed a convention where someone would review a 
> test and if the test was found fine she/he would add <link rel=reviewer> 
> meaning that the test was approved. If the test was not found fine 
> changes would be made and the original author would verify the changes. 
> However, what flag is used in that case?
> 
> Would it make sense for the person making changes to add a <link 
> rel=contributor> and for the original author to add the reviewer keyword 
> to his/her <link rel=author> element? Roughly you would either end up with:
> 
>   <link rel=author href=...>
>   <link rel=reviewer href=...>
> 
> or
> 
>   <link rel="author reviewer" href=...>
>   <link rel=contributor href=...>
> 
> And the combination of the entities identified by author, contributor, 
> and reviewer would be responsible for the correctness of the test.
> 
> (Until this is agreed upon/clarified I will not review any tests.)

I've updated the review process and format documentation
   http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/review
   http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/format#reviewer
with the format requested by the WG
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Mar/0334.html

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2009 18:19:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:51:58 GMT