W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > May 2008

Re: Testing SHOULD

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 09:49:39 -0700
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20080503164939.GA6201@ridley.dbaron.org>

On Saturday 2008-05-03 08:50 -0700, fantasai wrote:
> Ok, I'm adding two flags to the list:
> rec
>   Behavior tested is RECOMMENDED, but not REQUIRED. [RFC2119]
> optional
>   Behavior tested is preferred but OPTIONAL. [RFC2119] (These tests
>   must be reviewed by a test suite owner or peer.)

rec could easily be confused with the W3C REC (Recommendation)

I prefer should and may given that the spec-writing community tends
to refer to these requirement levels as shoulds and mays.


L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Saturday, 3 May 2008 16:50:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:17 UTC