On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:26:05 +0100, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com> wrote: > The test cases are published now at > http://samples.msdn.microsoft.com/csstestpages/default.htm. Awesome guys! I went quite quickly through these tests (mostly by checking which failed in Opera 9.2x) and found some small issues: http://samples.msdn.microsoft.com/csstestpages/Chapter_14/background-position-041.htm http://samples.msdn.microsoft.com/csstestpages/Chapter_14/background-position-042.htm http://samples.msdn.microsoft.com/csstestpages/Chapter_14/background-position-045.htm http://samples.msdn.microsoft.com/csstestpages/Chapter_14/background-position-046.htm are all invalid per CSS 2.1. The keyword needs to be on a specific side of the length/percentage per CSS 2.1. http://samples.msdn.microsoft.com/csstestpages/Chapter_12/content-applies-to-001.htm is valid per CSS 2.1 but CSS 3 allows this. It makes sense to not test such things in CSS 2.1 to me. For instance, we wouldn't test p::before { content: "FAIL" } either because it's obvious that Selectors Level 3 endorses such a syntax. Some tests have an unclear passing condition, but I haven't put references down for those. In general these looks pretty good though. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2008 18:13:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 5 March 2008 18:13:54 GMT