- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:33:40 -0500
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, fantasai wrote: >> Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think it would be good if the tests were licensed under the MIT license as >>> that makes it much more clear for software projects whether they can reuse >>> them. I believe the W3C Document License is currently not suitable for >>> everyone. >> Can you give a specific example, please? > > The W3C document license doesn't allow for modifications, and requires > more boilerplate than ideal. This makes it unsuitable for a number of > projects. Yes, this I agree is a problem, and I'm talking with Rigo about it. But again, if you or Anne have specific examples that would help. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2008 07:33:52 UTC