- From: Eira Monstad <eiram@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:48:32 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:38:43 +0200, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > Eira Monstad wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:21:04 +0200, fantasai >> <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> >>> Eira Monstad wrote: >>>> Cheers, >>>> I've been working on some bidi related tests for the 2.1 testsuite, >>>> as well as converting a few of Richard Ishida's tests for language >>>> dependent styling to match the testsuite template. The tests are >>>> ready for review at http://people.opera.com/eiram/test/css21/review/ >>> >>> http://people.opera.com/eiram/test/css21/review/bidi-direction-001.xht >>> http://people.opera.com/eiram/test/css21/review/bidi-direction-002.xht >>> >>> So.. there seem to be two main assertions here: >>> - That 'direction' inherits (and affects the paragraph text as >>> defined). >>> - That 'direction' affects alignment. >>> Both tests test both, and I'm having a hard time figuring out what is >>> functionally different between the two. >> 001 tests that body direction is inherited by element when direction >> is not specified on the paragraph. >> 002 tests that body direction is overridden correctly by direction >> property on the paragraph. >> I have updated the assert in 002 to make the difference clearer. > > They both test both. It's just that in 001 the "override" test is called > the control, and its default alignment is not tested. Ok, fair enough. Pick one and leave the other :) -- Eira Monstad CoreQA Furthermore, it is my opinion that BTS2 must be destroyed
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2008 05:50:41 UTC