W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Not compliant XHTML MS tests.

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:11:20 -0700
Message-ID: <47F57228.5010207@inkedblade.net>
To: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
CC: Robert Stam <robert@tallcomponents.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>

Arron Eicholz wrote:
> Robert Stam wrote:
>> Chapter_4\bad-selector.htm: do not include & in css style, because it will be
>> an incorrect entity, use CDATA section.
>> Chapter_4\invalid-decl-at-rule-001.htm: do not include & in css style, because
>> it will be an incorrect entity, use CDATA section.
>> Chapter_4\escaped-ident-001.htm: '&' character should be escaped in id.
>> Chapter_4\escaped-ident-spaces-001.htm: '&' character should be escaped in id.
>> Chapter_12\before-location-001.htm: incorrect '<' character.
>> Chapter_14\Properties\Background-repeat\background-repeat-005.htm: </p> missing
>> Chapter_16\white-space-009.htm: [nowrap] attribute may not be placed in XHTML.
>> Chapter_16\white-space-011.htm: [wrap] attribute may not be placed in XHTML.
> 
> Chapter_4\bad-selector.htm: is flagged as invalid and does not need to validate
> Chapter_4\invalid-decl-at-rule-001.htm: is flagged as invalid and does not need to validate
> Chapter_4\escaped-ident-001.htm: This case now flagged as invalid
> Chapter_4\escaped-ident-spaces-001.htm: This case now flagged as invalid
> Chapter_12\before-location-001.htm: '<' character is now properly changed to &lt;
> Chapter_14\Properties\Background-repeat\background-repeat-005.htm: <p> tag is now closed properly
> Chapter_16\white-space-009.htm: attribute corrected to be valid HTML but case is flagged as HTMLonly.
> Chapter_16\white-space-011.htm: case correct to be valid. Attribute removed.
> 
> These changes will be in our next release of test files. Thank you for submitting these issues.

Hi Arron,
As Anne points out, all of these tests need to validate as XHTML.
If they are testing invalid CSS, then they shouldn't pass the
*CSS* validator, but they do need to validate as XHTML. Robert's
suggetion of using a CDATA section would be the easiest way to
fix the tests where CSS data is tripping up the XML parser.

Thanks~

~fantasai
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 00:12:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:51:56 GMT