W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2007

Re: page-break-after proposed tests

From: Michael Turnwall <mturnwall@revenution.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:05:59 -0700
Message-Id: <87EDEB00-5595-419B-95CE-FF4866BD62D2@revenution.com>
To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
I changed the wording for this test. I also added the invalid flag. I  
checked in Prince and the test passes.

http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break- 
after-invalid-syntax-15-a.xht


Michael Turnwall
mturnwall@revenution.com
www.revenution.com



On Oct 5, 2007, at 12:04 AM, fantasai wrote:

>
> Michael Turnwall wrote:
>> Edits have been made.
>
> http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break- 
> after-always-01-a.xht
>
> Added as
>   page-break-after-000.xht
>
> http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break- 
> after-auto-02-a.xht
>
> Added as
>   page-break-after-001.xht
> and removed extraneous .dummy rule.
>
> http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break- 
> after-invalid-syntax-15-a.xht
>
> I wrote:
>> This test is incorrect.
>>  ...
>> BTW, did you run your tests in Prince to see if they pass? Because  
>> this
>> one, as written, should have failed.
>
> The test is still incorrect. And you did not answer my question  
> about whether
> or not you tested in PrinceXML.
>
> http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break- 
> after-inline-elements-16-a.xht
>
> Added as
>   page-break-after-002.xht
>
> http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break- 
> after-no-inherit-17-a.xht
>
> Added as
>   page-break-after-003.xht
>
> ~fantasai
>
Received on Sunday, 7 October 2007 21:06:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:51:55 GMT