Re: page-break-after proposed tests

Michael Turnwall wrote:
> Edits have been made.

http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break-after-always-01-a.xht

Added as
   page-break-after-000.xht

http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break-after-auto-02-a.xht

Added as
   page-break-after-001.xht
and removed extraneous .dummy rule.

http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break-after-invalid-syntax-15-a.xht

I wrote:
> This test is incorrect.
>  ...
> BTW, did you run your tests in Prince to see if they pass? Because this
> one, as written, should have failed. 

The test is still incorrect. And you did not answer my question about whether
or not you tested in PrinceXML.

http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break-after-inline-elements-16-a.xht

Added as
   page-break-after-002.xht

http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break-after-no-inherit-17-a.xht

Added as
   page-break-after-003.xht

~fantasai