W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2007

Re: page-break-after proposed tests

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 03:04:18 -0400
Message-ID: <4705E1F2.3050004@inkedblade.net>
To: Michael Turnwall <mturnwall@revenution.com>
CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org

Michael Turnwall wrote:
> Edits have been made.

http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break-after-always-01-a.xht

Added as
   page-break-after-000.xht

http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break-after-auto-02-a.xht

Added as
   page-break-after-001.xht
and removed extraneous .dummy rule.

http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break-after-invalid-syntax-15-a.xht

I wrote:
> This test is incorrect.
>  ...
> BTW, did you run your tests in Prince to see if they pass? Because this
> one, as written, should have failed. 

The test is still incorrect. And you did not answer my question about whether
or not you tested in PrinceXML.

http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break-after-inline-elements-16-a.xht

Added as
   page-break-after-002.xht

http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page-break-after-no-inherit-17-a.xht

Added as
   page-break-after-003.xht

~fantasai
Received on Friday, 5 October 2007 07:05:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:51:55 GMT