W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2007

RE: Publishing draft of css3-color testsuite?

From: Grant, Melinda <melinda.grant@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:01:41 -0000
Message-ID: <78A3602ADF54BA4EAB53F378BF55588B01D59BBF@G3W0067.americas.hpqcorp.net>
To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>
Cc: "Bert Bos" <bert@w3.org>


I was unable to access
http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS3/Color/20070927/xhtml1/.

Melinda 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-css-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:w3c-css-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of fantasai
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 8:25 AM
> To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org; w3c-css-wg@w3.org
> Cc: Bert Bos
> Subject: Re: Publishing draft of css3-color testsuite?
> 
> 
> L. David Baron wrote:
> > I've written some basic tests to cover much of css3-color that are 
> > currently checked in to dev.w3.org CVS:
> >   http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/CSS/css3-color-test-suite/
> > The build process is much like the CSS2.1 test suite.  Run "make"
> > and the tests and other files that should be published show up in 
> > "dist".  In fact, it requires that the CSS2.1 test suite be checked 
> > out in the same CVS pull since it uses some files from it (the lib 
> > directory).
> > 
> > I'd like to get these published to a Web site where people 
> can browse 
> > them.  Is it reasonable to publish an initial dated version on 
> > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/ ?  Does the working group need to 
> > decide to do this?
> 
> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS3/Color/20070927/
> 
> Unfortunately directory listings still don't work, so I need 
> to pester sysreq some more.
> 
> ~fantasai
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 18:03:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:51:55 GMT