W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2007

Re: page-break-before proposed tests

From: Michael Turnwall <mturnwall@revenution.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 21:58:26 -0700
Message-Id: <488013A4-2F31-4FE5-BC3F-1E42606688AB@revenution.com>
To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Edits have been made.


Michael Turnwall
mturnwall@revenution.com
www.revenution.com



On Sep 26, 2007, at 8:26 AM, fantasai wrote:

>
> Michael Turnwall wrote:
>> Here's some more paged media tests.
> >
>> *page-break-before: always*
>> http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page- 
>> break-before-always-03-a.xht
>
> As with the last set, I'd remove the .dummy class from the first  
> sentence.
>
>> *page-break-before: auto*
>> http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page- 
>> break-before-auto-04-a.xht
>
> I'd change the sentences here to match those in the equivalent  
> after test case:
>   "There must not be a page break after this line of text."
>   "This sentence must be on the first page."
>
>> *page-break-before: (inline elements)*
>> http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page- 
>> break-before-inline-05-a.xht
>
> Use the same text here as in the auto test case.
>
>> *page-break-before: (invalid syntax)*
>> http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page- 
>> break-before-invalid-syntax-14-a.xht
>
> This test is incorrect, same problems as the equivalent -after test.
> Also, please add the 'invalid' flag.
>
>> *page-break-before: (no inherit)*
>> http://www.revenutiontesting.com/w3c/page_breaks/t130301-page- 
>> break-before-no-inherit-12-a.xht
>
> I'd change the text to use the same text as the equivalent -after  
> test.
> (Also remove the dummy class from the non-dummy last sentence in  
> both tests.)
>
> ~fantasai
>
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2007 04:58:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:51:55 GMT