W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > May 2004

Re: CSS Selectors -- clarification requested

From: Justin Wood <jw6057@bacon.qcc.mass.edu>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 14:46:54 -0400
Message-ID: <40B8DA9E.2090605@bacon.qcc.mass.edu>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-css-testsuite@w3.org

Ian Hickson wrote:

>On Wed, 19 May 2004, Justin Wood wrote:
>  
>
>>http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS3/Selectors/20040510/html/tests/css3-modsel-162.html
>>
>>This test makes it unclear of what /exactly/ should 'pass' or 'fail'
>>(if cursor is not same for each box would it fail, IE: if cursor is not
>>crosshair for 'tree' in both boxes.
>>
>>This should be clarified in test
>>    
>>
>
>Good point. The new text will read:
>
>   <p>Select everything in this document. The following two constructs
>   (in the thick black borders) should end up looking identical. You
>   should also check that the cursor is the same on equivalent parts
>   (in particular the cursor should either be a crosshair over "Tree"
>   and the default everywhere else, or the default everywhere).</p>
>
>Let me know if that is clear enough.
>
>  
>
Sounds good, but my marking 'should' that implies (at least to me) that 
it /is/ still possible to pass if the cursor is not the same, even on a 
UA that supports cursor.  The pass/fail criteria is more what I was 
looking at in that test.

~Justin Wood
Received on Saturday, 29 May 2004 14:48:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:51:54 GMT