csswg/css3-multicol Overview.src.html,1.140,1.141

Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-multicol
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv11561

Modified Files:
	Overview.src.html 
Log Message:
revising text based on Anton Prowse's message, adding examples

Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-multicol/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.140
retrieving revision 1.141
diff -u -d -r1.140 -r1.141
--- Overview.src.html	9 Jan 2012 18:35:43 -0000	1.140
+++ Overview.src.html	9 Jan 2012 18:46:10 -0000	1.141
@@ -87,7 +87,9 @@
 contradiction between the text and the pseudo-algorithm in
 section 3.4. The pseudo-algorithm was corrected and also made
 easier to read. The wording of a few other sections was improved in
-places, without changes to the functionality.
+places, without changes to the functionality. In January, 2012, some
+examples and the description of the 'column-fill' property was
+revised.
 
 <p>This document will remain Candidate Recommendation at least until
 12 May 2011. See the <a href="#cr-exit-criteria">CR exit
@@ -383,7 +385,7 @@
 </div>
 
 
-<p>Column boxes act as the containing block for their content. That
+<p>Column boxes are block container boxes. That
 is, column boxes behave like block-level, table cell, and inline-block
 boxes as per CSS 2.1, section 10.1, item 2 [[!CSS21]]. However, column
 boxes do not establish containing blocks for elements with ''position:
@@ -1089,7 +1091,8 @@
 
 <p>When content is laid out in multiple columns, the user agent must
 determine where column breaks are placed. The problem of breaking
-content into columns is similar to breaking content into pages, which is described in [[!CSS21]]. <!--add specific reference to 13.3.3 -->
+content into columns is similar to breaking content into pages, which
+is described in CSS 2.1, section 13.3.3 [[!CSS21]].
 
 <p>Three new properties are introduced to allow column breaks to be
 described in the same properties as page breaks: 'break-before',

Received on Monday, 9 January 2012 18:46:19 UTC